According to a recent study, homeopathic treatments would “not convincing noticeable effects beyond placebo.”
Professor Paul Glasziou works at Bond University. He was in charge of a working group of the National Health and Medical Researh Council, whose purpose was to examine the evidence of 176 homeopathic trials to determine the validity of the treatment.
On 57 systematic reviews, containing 176 individual studies focused on 68 different health conditions, it is clear that there is no evidence that homeopathy is more effective than placebos. The report found no “discernible and compelling” effects of homeopathy “beyond mere placebo”. In conclusion, there is “no reliable evidence from research done on humans, which would prove that homeopathy is effective in treating all health states considered”.
Homeopathy is a medical alternative based on the dilution of a substance in water. According to the British National Health Service (NHS), “practitioners believe that the effectiveness of a substance increases if diluted in plenty of water. Several homeopathic remedies consist of substances which have been diluted several times until there is no more or hardly any primary substance “.
On a blog of the British Medical Journal, Professor Glasziou said: “As president of the group that published the report, I am satisfied with the analysis of the facts At first I wondered if that. treatment method could be effective, but after making 57 systematic reviews have shown that homeopathy is ineffective, my perspective has changed I can understand why Samuel Hahnemann ”
.” – the founder of homeopathy – was unhappy with the medical practices of the 18th century, such as bleeding or purging, and has therefore tried to find a better alternative. ” Glasziou think however that its creator would be disappointed by the failure of this method.